🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing group of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that phones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be passed soon.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to enact a bill lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory resolution demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "addictive" design of these services, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a solid starting point," stated a leading MEP supporting the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the government pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after encountering harmful social media material contends that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are safe and fit for young users," commented a leading peer.

America: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, regulation is primarily unfolding at the state level due to national gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a measure prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills mandating parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from some politicians to copy Australia's example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Beyond the West, further nations are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, international organizations take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could backfire". The organization notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

Even as this global conversation evolves, the actions of the Australian government and its followers indicate that governments around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.